Reading in the dark? Tap here to switch themes.

You Already Tried the All-in-One. Here's Why It Didn't Stick.

Searching for a Kajabi alternative? You're not the first switch to fail. Here's why swapping platforms doesn't fix tool sprawl — and what actually does.

Riaan Smith· 12 min read
You Already Tried the All-in-One. Here's Why It Didn't Stick.

On January 13, 2026, Kajabi restructured its pricing. Basic went from $149 to $179 per month. Growth went from $199 to $249. Pro went from $399 to $499. The $89/month Kickstarter tier was eliminated entirely. Existing customers were not grandfathered. Cancellations are still governed by a strict no-refund policy.

The response was immediate and loud. An active thread on r/kajabi. A Change.org petition. An open Better Business Bureau file with a dozen-plus unanswered complaints. If you're angry, that anger is documented and legitimate — not invented.

But here's what I want to say to the reader who has never logged into Kajabi once: this post is still for you. If you've been inside Skool, Circle, or a duct-taped DIY stack of five tools that technically talk to each other, you have almost certainly had the same experience. The promise was "one place, fewer logins." Somewhere along the way, that quietly stopped being true. You added a tool to fix a gap. Then another. Now you are the glue holding the whole thing together.

That is the problem I want to talk about. Not which platform is cheapest. The actual structural problem.

The Quick Answer

If you're skimming: Kajabi raised prices 20–25% across all plans in January 2026 with no grandfather clause. Most people looking for a Kajabi alternative are solving a real problem, but switching to another rented platform usually relocates the fragmentation rather than fixing it. Before you switch, diagnose whether you have a tool problem (one specific feature or price broke) or a stitching problem (your business runs on disconnected systems and you are the manual integration layer). If it's the second one, a different platform alone won't save you. A hub-centric foundation — where one member record ties together your website, community, courses, and email — is the structural fix. The rest of this post explains how to tell the difference and what to actually check before you switch again.

What Actually Happened With Kajabi's Pricing in 2026

Let me just state the facts plainly, because a lot of the coverage has been vague about the specifics.

Kajabi's January 13, 2026 restructure raised every plan by roughly 20–25%. The Kickstarter tier at $89/month — which served a lot of early-stage creators — was removed entirely. The Basic plan moved from $149 to $179. Growth moved from $199 to $249. Pro moved from $399 to $499. No existing customer was offered a locked-in rate. The no-refund policy, which was already in place, means anyone who paid in advance has no recourse.

The Better Business Bureau file, the Change.org petition, and the Reddit thread are all publicly visible as of this writing. I'm citing them because they matter for context: this wasn't a minor adjustment that slipped by unnoticed. It landed hard, and the community response was fast.

A 20–25% price increase on a tool that already costs $149–$499 per month is significant. I understand why that triggers a platform search. What I want to complicate is the next move — the instinct to find the cheapest alternative and migrate immediately.

Why Switching Platforms Usually Doesn't Fix This

Every "best Kajabi alternatives" listicle you've read — and there are dozens of them, ranking SamCart, Circle.so, Podia, Ruzuku, beehiiv, and others — was written by a competitor with a financial reason to point you toward a specific destination. None of them can honestly say the quiet part: switching to a different rented platform alone usually does not fix the underlying problem.

Here's the diagnostic question that actually matters: was your original failure a tool problem or a stitching problem?

A tool problem is specific and bounded. One feature doesn't exist. One price is now unjustifiable. One integration broke and the company won't fix it. Those problems are real, and a platform switch can solve them — if you choose carefully.

A stitching problem is structural. Your business runs across several disconnected systems — maybe a course platform, a community tool, an email provider, a checkout tool, a landing page builder — and you are the manual integration layer holding them together. You copy-paste member data. You tag people in three places. You run reports from memory because no single tool has the full picture. When you switch platforms, you move the furniture but the floor plan is the same.

The reason most people who switch once end up switching again within months is this: they treated the symptom. The new platform has the same seams in different places.

I've written about the actual mechanics of this pattern in Why Your Coaching Tech Stack Keeps Breaking if you want the tool-sprawl side broken down in more detail.

And here's the thing — Kajabi's own paying users already describe this exact pattern, in their own words. Three Capterra reviews worth reading:

"Too many options. Too many Kajabi tabs are open to interact with people."

— Katja D., Teacherpreneur — Capterra review of Kajabi

"They try to do too much making their software slow and clunky... Definitely not worth the money."

— Kathie O., CEO, Health/Wellness/Fitness — Capterra review of Kajabi

"The workflow is often very disjointed when creating a new product."

— Maureen B., Executive Director, Education Management — Capterra review of Kajabi

These aren't edge cases. These are paying customers describing bloat, fragmentation, and disjointed workflows inside a platform marketed specifically as a unified solution. If that sounds familiar, the problem is not Kajabi specifically. It's what happens when a platform tries to be everything and you are the one navigating the seams between its parts.

How to Tell Which Problem You Actually Have

Run through this honestly. These are the questions I'd ask anyone before recommending they move anything:

  • When a new member joins, how many places do you have to manually add or update their information?
  • Can you look at one screen and see a member's purchase history, course progress, community activity, and email engagement together — or do you need multiple tabs?
  • When a payment fails or a membership lapses, does access revoke automatically everywhere — or do you have to manually update it in two or three places?
  • How many Zapier (or Make) automations are currently the only thing keeping your tools connected? What breaks if one of them fails silently?
  • If you took a two-week vacation with no phone, would your member experience stay consistent — or would something fall through the cracks without you?

If most of your answers involve manual steps, multiple tabs, or Zapier duct tape, you have a stitching problem. Switching platforms will give you a brief honeymoon period, and then the same pattern will reassemble itself.

What "Hub-Centric" Means Instead of "All-in-One"

The term "all-in-one" has been used to sell so many platforms that it's become almost meaningless. What it usually describes is: several different products, built at different times by different teams, bolted together under one brand and one login screen. The seams are still there. You just can't see them until you hit them.

Hub-centric is a structural description, not a feature list. Here's the actual difference:

In a hub-centric architecture, there is one member record. That record is the source of truth. When someone joins your community, buys a course, opens an email, or updates their profile — all of it updates the same record. Your website, your community, your courses, and your email all read from and write to that same foundation. There is no copying data between tools. There is no Zap that might fail at 2am.

The second structural distinction is ownership. Most rented platforms — Kajabi, Circle, Skool, Podia — hold your member data inside their system. You can export a CSV, but the live record belongs to them. If they raise prices again, change their terms, or shut down a tier, you are negotiating from a position of dependency. An owned foundation means the database is yours — the infrastructure runs under your control, and the data doesn't leave when you do.

Think of it this way: rented platforms are furnished apartments. Convenient, but the landlord sets the rent and the rules. An owned foundation is a house you built on land you hold. You still use services — utilities, maybe a property manager — but the foundation isn't someone else's to reprice.

This doesn't mean "self-host everything yourself" or "become a developer." It means choosing infrastructure where you hold the member data and the relationship — rather than renting access to your own audience from a platform that can change its pricing on 30 days' notice.

What To Check Before You Switch Again

If you decide to move, do this inventory first. I'd argue you can't make a good decision without it.

  1. List every tool your business currently runs on. Course platform. Community tool. Email provider. Checkout / payment processor. Landing page builder. Scheduler. Analytics. Video hosting. Membership management. All of it.
  2. Calculate the real cost of each. Monthly subscription, yes — but also transaction fees (a 2% fee at $10k/month is $200 gone that doesn't show up on a pricing page), per-seat costs as you grow, and add-ons you had to bolt on to make the base tool functional.
  3. Map where your member and payment data actually lives. Which tool is the system of record? Can you export a complete member history — purchases, engagement, tags, status — from a single place? Or is the full picture split across three platforms?
  4. Identify every task that requires you to manually move data between systems. New member onboarding. Payment failure handling. Upsell access grants. Refund processing. Segment tagging. Each one of these is a seam. Count them.
  5. Ask: does the platform I'm considering actually eliminate those seams, or just move them? Demand a specific answer, not a sales deck. Ask where member data lives. Ask who owns it. Ask what happens to your data if you cancel.

Most people skip this inventory because it's uncomfortable. It makes the actual cost of tool sprawl visible. Do it anyway. You cannot make a good structural decision without knowing the current structure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Kajabi raise prices in 2026?

Kajabi has not publicly released a detailed explanation for the January 13, 2026 restructure beyond standard language about continued platform investment. What's documented is what changed: Basic from $149 to $179, Growth from $199 to $249, Pro from $399 to $499, and the elimination of the $89/month Kickstarter tier. No existing customers were grandfathered. I won't speculate on internal motivations beyond what's publicly stated.

Is Kajabi worth it in 2026?

That depends entirely on how you use it. If Kajabi's feature set maps closely to your actual workflow and the new pricing is still proportionate to what you earn on the platform, it may still make sense. The problem the Capterra reviews surface — bloat, slowness, disjointed workflows — is structural and isn't resolved by the price change. If you were already frustrated with the UX before January 2026, a 20–25% increase is unlikely to change your experience of those issues.

What's the best Kajabi alternative for coaches?

I'm going to be honest with you: the right answer depends on whether you have a tool problem or a stitching problem. If one specific feature is the issue, a targeted tool swap may be all you need. If your real problem is fragmentation — member data split across platforms, manual work to keep things in sync, you as the integration layer — then "best alternative" is the wrong frame. The question becomes: what hub-centric foundation lets me run one member record across my website, community, courses, and email, on infrastructure I actually own? That's a different evaluation than a feature comparison chart.

Why do people switch away from all-in-one platforms and end up switching again?

Because they treated the symptom — the specific platform — instead of the structural cause. If your business is held together by manual data entry and fragile automations, moving those same workflows to a new platform just relocates the fragmentation. The seams reappear in slightly different places, and within months the same frustrations resurface. This is the stitching problem, and a platform switch alone can't fix it.

How do I know if a new platform will actually fix my problem, or just move it?

Ask the platform this directly: does one member record update across my website, community, courses, and email when anything changes — or will I need separate automations to keep them in sync? Ask where your member and payment data lives and whether you can export a complete history from a single place. Ask what happens to your data if you cancel. If the answers are vague, the seams are still there.

What should I check before switching platforms again?

List every tool you currently run. Calculate the real cost including transaction fees and add-ons. Map where your member and payment data actually lives. Identify every task that requires you to manually move data between systems. Then ask whether the platform you're considering eliminates those manual steps or just moves them somewhere new.

What does "hub-centric" actually mean?

Hub-centric means your website, community, courses, and email all read from and write to one member record that you own. When someone joins, buys, engages, or lapses, it updates in one place — not in three separate platforms each keeping their own account of who your members are. It's the structural opposite of stitching tools together. The data doesn't live in a rented room someone else controls. It lives in a foundation you hold.

If you've read this far, you're probably not looking for a quick swap. You're looking for something that actually holds. The most useful next step I can offer isn't a product pitch — it's a free Hub Audit: a personalized scan of your current tool stack that maps what each tool costs you (including the hidden costs), where your member data actually lives, and how many manual stitching tasks you're currently carrying. No deck, no demo — just a clear picture of what you're actually working with. Find out for yourself what the audit surfaces before you decide anything.

If you want to learn the full hub-centric framework before you're ready to audit anything, the Memberflow community is free to join. It's where coaches and creators are working through exactly this — not another platform comparison, but the structural conversation about building a business on a foundation you own.

If the burnout of being everyone's connective tissue sounds familiar too, I've written about that side of it in How to Build a Membership Community Without Burning Out.

Ready to stop building disconnected pieces?

Get a free, personalized scan of your current tool stack — see exactly what fragmentation is costing you before you change anything.